Download Figures and data.
Spatial distribution, SFD:
| N = 5∙103 | N = 1∙104 | N = 2∙104 | N = 5∙104 | N = 1∙105 | N = 2∙105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Target much more fragmented (cf. SFD)! Possibly, small fragments reach higher mutual velocities and reaccumulate less? Why a different spatial distribution of the direct ejecta? cf. hobson07.sph, 2DO: check setup once again! | On contrary, target much less fragmented! Possibly, small fragments are more numerous? |
SFDs in 1 Fig.:
